Is Lala.com a label slave?
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 at 05:19PM
Is Lala.com just blahblah?Sometimes Techcrunch is too easy to impress. I think Inquisitr’s review is closer to the truth: Lala is trying to get people to pay to listen to streamed music on their desktop when they can already listen to streamed music for free from any number of providers - last.fm, grooveshark, even major portals like Yahoo! do better.
Lala’s CEO is Geoff Ralston, who used to head Yahoo!’s communications business. This being Lala’s third reincarnation, I wonder if the backers have just told Ralston to do what ever the majors want in order to licence a decent catalogue? Because this iteration feels like something major labels want more than something consumers want. Hence the geographical limit preventing users outside the US from using Lala. Not even Yahoo! Music has geographical restrictions on its streamed music.
Yes, there’s a difference in consumer benefit between per-track on demand similar music on demand, but not $0.10’s worth. We have to expect that a wide variety of music licensing models will be tested in this brave new world and only a fraction of them will make it. I’m betting this one won’t.


